AIMS Research

-
AIMS home
-
About AIMS
-
Research
-
Facilities
-
News
-
Search
-
Site map
-
Site index
-
Topics index




contents
previous
next





North west shelf modelling workshop

PRESENTATION SUMMARY

Large and mesoscale oceanography: Recent or current studies and/or future plans

Chair: Stan Massel

13:30 Stuart Godfrey (CSIRO,Tas) – Seasonal sea level variations and circulation

Abstract: Wind forcing, tidal mixing and the seasonal heat budget of Australia’s Northwest waters (J. Stuart Godfrey and James Mansbridge)

Fifteen years of expendable bathythermograph (XBT) data from three lines that cross Australia’s North West Shelf and the shallow part of the Timor Sea – a region of broad continental shelf referred to below as "The Shelf" – have been used, with climatological salinity data, to estimate onshore geostrophic flow onto the Shelf. A wind stress climatology is used for onshore Ekman transport. Onshore geostrophic flow in the top 200m onto the whole Shelf has an annual mean of 3.1 Sv; it is weakest (0.8 Sv) in May-June, and strongest (5.1 Sv) in January. The onshore Ekman transport has an annual mean of only –0.5 Sv, but its annual cycle almost completely cancels that of the geostrophic flow, so that the net onshore flow varies little through the year from its annual mean of 2.6 Sv. Most of this probably exits through southern end of the Shelf, as the annual mean Leeuwin Current. The small annual cycle of the net onshore flow suggests that longshore flow at the northern end of the section must have the same seasonal cycle as at the southern end. 

Data limitations and inter-annual variability in longshore current data mean that we have not been able to obtain adequate mass budget closure. There is about 1 Sv of onshore geostrophic flow below 200m in winter, onto the northern Shelf. We have used climatological heat fluxes and temperatures on the Shelf to estimate mean seasonal net heat export from the Shelf’ export is positive throughout the year on the northern Shelf, and is negative for only three months of less on the southern Shelf. Despite the lack of mass closure, we can infer some mechanisms by which this export is carried out. The Gentilli (1972) mechanism of alternating longshelf seasonal flow cannot explain all the observations. 

Summer wind-driven upwelling can export substantial amounts of heat from both the northern and southern Shelf. The deep winter inflow to the northern Shelf probably upwells into the Arafura Sea, where nutrient-rich inflow has been observed (Rochford 1966). This flow has the right magnitude to supply westward Ekman transports in winter, between Irian Jaya and Australia. Indicators of tidal mixing (Field and Gordon 1996) are widespread on the Shelf, and tidal mixing may explain why summer SST over the Shelf shows no coastal minimum, despite moderately large offshore Ekman transports. Winter wind-driven upwelling in the Arafura Sea, and summer upwelling over the Shelf – both modified by tidal mixing – may play a large role in controlling the seasonal cycle of SST over Australia’s northwest waters. Biases in climatological surface heat fluxes in the summer cyclone season make it difficult to infer the causes of the summer SST maximum.

 

Presentation and Discussion Notes:

Stuart Godfrey presented the results of his research on the seasonal cycles of ocean temperatures, and circulation including geostrophic and Ekman flows into and out of the NW shelf region.

He commenced by discussing the results of a Global ocean model with 2 deg E-W and 0.5 deg N-S grid resolution that is coupled to a Bureau of Meteorology model of SST variations. He pointed out that the models show cold and warm features along the West American Coast and asked why similar anomalies do not appear off the West Australian coast.

The dynamics of the WA region are indeed quite different from the rest of the world, yet SST controls Australian climate. In summer, he estimates an offshelf Ekman transport of 3 Sv (1 Sv = 106 m3/s), yet he observes no significant drop in coastal temperatures. He then asked why is there no upwelling signature in the Coastal SSTs? One reason for this may be the effects of tidal mixing. The temperature evolution in the Gulf of Carpentaria is strongly influenced by tidal variations. Where internal tidal effects are present, one would expect to see temperature variations on the scale of the spring/neap tidal cycle. Such effects of tidal mixing, are evident in the Indonesian seas. By estimating steric heights offshore from NW Australia using ship of opportunity XBT data and comparing these with observed sea levels it can be demonstrated that sea level variations agree with fluctuations in the Leeuwin current, with set up of sea levels occurring in winter.

Sea level differences along shore have also been used to estimate onshore geostrophic flows. There is a steady onshore flow of 2.5 Sv onto the NW Shelf. In summer, on the NW shelf offshore Ekman flows (upwelling) oppose the onshelf geostrophic flows. In winter, outflows occur in very narrow jets corresponding with the Leeuwin current and an associated undercurrent.

How can you have upwelling and not have SST cooling at the coast?

  • One hypothesis is that tidally generated internal waves lead to vertical mixing of water as it upwells.
  • Features are observed to be much stronger near the coast, with internal mixing layers of order 100 m deep inshore (ie, shallower than the 200 m isobath).

Conclusions regarding the N Australian SST:

  • In Dec-Jan SST follows heat flux variations
  • Cooling occurs in Jan-April, possibly related to tidal mixing.
  • Rapid cooling related to upwelling occurs as cold dry winds are established in winter.
  • Cooling occurs over the Arafura Sea in winter due to upwelling, but the effects are disguised by tidal mixing.

In discussion Miles Furnas pointed out that subsurface temperatures in the vicinity of Scott Reef peak during May-June, compared with surface temperatures which peak during Dec-Jan.

 

13:50 Stephen Walker (CSIRO,Tas) – Shelf-scale modelling studies

We have been developing and applying numerical hydrodynamical models of the North West Shelf, primarily to simulate response to tropical cyclones. The models have been used by WNI in their determination of design criteria for offshore structures and operations. To date, the model has been applied over the western region of the NW shelf with 10- and 20-km grids, and near the Gorgon and Laminaria gas fields with 5-km grids. In anticipation of upcoming work on the NW shelf, preliminary runs with a domain extending from Shark Bay to Darwin have been conducted.

The model we have been using was developed at CSIRO and is a three-dimensional, baroclinic, hydrostatic, z-coordinate model with one-way nesting. Vertical mixing can be prescribed or calculated using a Mellor-Yamada level 2 scheme, and bottom drag can be prescribed or calculated using a Grant-Madsen wave-current boundary layer formulation. The model has been compared with oceanographic data collected by Woodside, WNI, ADFA, and CSIRO and performs reasonably well. The greatest errors can be attributed to errors in wind forcing and specification of open-ocean boundary conditions. In addition, the model generally underestimates the amplitude of internal waves. Experiments with an essentially two-dimensional (cross-shelf and vertical) "slice" model indicate that very high resolution can address some, but not all, of the internal wave problem. It is likely that accurate reproduction of internal-wave activity will require 1) high resolution in three dimensions and 2) detailed boundary-condition information, and possibly 3) a non-hydrostatic model.

 

Presentation and Discussion Notes:

Stephen focussed on work they are doing using numerical models to predict the response of the circulation off NW Australia to tropical cyclones.

Model 1 has a domain ranging from Coral Bay, South of Ningaloo Reef to Ashmore Reef on the Sahul shelf including the area near the NW shelf. Using this model, the response to a numerical representation of Tropical Cyclone Bobby was simulated. Winds used to force the model were obtained from the North Rankin oil well platform. The simulated cyclone was parameterised to represent TC Bobby by specifying the wind field. However the approach resulted in wind speed being overpredicted by a factor of 2 to 3 and this resulted in some modelling errors.

The model response was compared with thermistor chain data obtained from moorings. The results showed that the model reproduced the effects of mixing due to the TC that resulted in vertical excursions of the isotherms of up to half of the water depth. The mixed layer recovered to a stratified state within 5-10 days.

Model 2 has a domain ranging from Darwin to Carnarvon. Stephen is planning to force this model with tropical cyclones Jan (1992), Bobby (1995), Frank (1995) and Oliver (1996). The intention is to couple the model to models of bottom sediment transport, nutrient fluxes, and productivity.

Model 3 is a vertical slice model with 600 layers with a vertical cell size of 0.5m in the top 300 m. The resolution is 500 m in the horizontal. The model showed fluctuations in the height of the internal interfaces in response to the barotropic and baroclinic tides.

 

14:10 Peter Holloway (ADFA) – Wind-driven circulation, cyclones

Synopsis:

Time series of currents measured over the continental shelf and slope regions from the North Rankin region, Exmouth Plateau and the Timor Sea show:

  • weak but persistent sub-inertial currents, typically 20 cm/s
  • predominantly poleward flow, particularly from March to July
  • flows frequently into prevailing winds
  • currents consistent with Leeuwin Current flow
  • ADCP surveys show poleward transports of ~4 Sv
  • some examples of equatorward flows responding to winds in winter/autumn

Tropical cyclones frequently occur on the NWS and produce strong currents over the shelf and slope regions:

  • cyclone currents often observed to produce flows of ~1 m/s
  • often only limited vertical mixing of the water column
  • inertial ringing often follows the maximum currents
  • 3D barotropic modelling gives reasonable agreement with observed currents during TC Ian (1982)
  • 2D model with bottom friction dependant on wind-wave enhanced motion predicts coastally trapped; wave response of TC Jane (1983)

Problems:

  • accurate specification of cyclone track and wind field
  • correct specification of surface drag coefficient

Future work:

  • use of 3D stratified models
  • correct parameterisation of turbulence and friction will be critical
  • use of satellite (scatterometer) winds to drive ocean models

 

Presentation and Discussion Notes:

Peter Holloway discussed wind-driven circulation and tropical currents

The typical circulation pattern of the NW shelf is characterised by weak but persistent sub-inertial currents, flowing predominantly poleward typically at about 20 cm/s. These occur particularly in the period March to July. The flow is frequently directed into the prevailing wind, consistent with the seasonal appearance of the Leeuwin Current offshore. Acoustic Doppler Current Meter surveys show poleward transports of about 4 Sv and there are some examples of equatorward flows in response to the wind during winter and autumn.

During Tropical Cyclone passages currents may attain flow rates of order 1 m/s, often attended by limited water column mixing and inertial ‘ringing’.

A 2D model with bottom friction dependent upon wind-driven surface waves has been used to predict coastally trapped waves.

The major problem in attaining accurate simulations is to correctly specify the drag coefficient.

In the future use of 3d stratified models with correct parameterisation of turbulence and friction will be critical. Use of satellite data (eg, scatterometry) to determine model wind fields for driving ocean models is also projected.

Historical current meter data shows mostly poleward flows while in August the flow tends to be equatorward. At North Rankin winds are predominantly poleward during March – May and variable at other times, giving rise to the seasonal variations in the Leeuwin Current.

Off the southern NW Shelf, data from the Exmouth Plateau obtained by ESSO in 1978 showed persistent but weak wind-driven flows.

Further north at Jabiru, on the Sahul Shelf flows were predominantly poleward with some reversals associated with winds.

ADCP section transports (after detiding) were also shown (eg, sections off Rowley Shoals). These show a narrowing of the flows as you move south.

Although tropical cyclone Jan passed close to the North Rankin platform, the response was relatively weak.

Derek Burrage asked if the ‘wave’ and ‘mixing’ response to TCs can be separated?

TC Jan, as observed at North Rankin showed quite strong flows yet the model produced no significant response there, which suggests the damping in the model is excessive.

Tang, Holloway and Grimshaw used a 2D depth-averaged model of the NW Shelf with quadratic bottom friction and a positionally-dependent drag coefficient (Tang and Grimshaw) JGR, 1996. This resulted in good agreement with the observed response for propagating coastal trapped waves. (JPO, 1997). However, some difficulties were experienced in getting the parameterisation right under extreme TC conditions.

 

14:30 Craig Steinberg (AIMS) – Long-term sea level and current observations

 

Presentation and Discussion Notes:

Craig Steinberg surveyed the available sea level and current meter observations acquired by AIMS since commencing operations in 1993. Physical oceanographic observations have been concentrated on a transect between Scott Reef and Adele Island. Tide gauges have been deployed at Rowley Shoals, Scott Reef and Adele Island in conjunction with an AIMS Woodside supported baseline environmental study. A current meter mooring has been deployed at the shelfbreak shoreward of Scott Reef, for the purpose of monitoring low frequency currents over the long term. This mooring was augmented during 1985 with additional current meters and a tide gauge set to sample tidal and super-tidal internal wave energy. Plans for field deployments in the vicinity of NW Cape were discussed on Day 2.

Stephen Walker asked whether telemetry could be used for real-time operational modelling in the NW Shelf context.

 

14:45 Lu Mason (JCU)– Tidal modelling of the Indonesian seas: a parameterised approach

Researchers: Lance Bode, Alex Harijanto, Luciano Mason

(Dept Civil & Environmental Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville)

Project context

  • Collaboration between AIMS and JCU
  • Work will form part of a student project
  • Will provide a basis for corrections to satellite altimetry measurements

Geographic domain

South East Asian, Indonesian and North West Australian seas.

Main activities

  • Collect bathymetric data of sufficient resolution and accuracy for input into our model
  • Collect sufficient tidal data for model calibration
  • To perform accurate tidal modelling for use with satellite altimetry.

Results

  • The determination of whether a parameterisation approach in the representation of islands and fine scale bathymetry can help improve modelling outcomes.
  • Improved knowledge of how complex bathymetry influence the tide in this region.

Future plans

  • To standardise and then categorise available tidal in term of reliability and accuracy
  • Add to bathymetry database
  • Improve accuracy of open boundary input
  • Calibrate the model for the major tidal constituents.

 

Presentation and Discussion Notes:

Lu presented the work he and Lance Bode are doing on tidal modelling in the Indonesian seas, including the Timor Sea and NW shelf. The motivation for the work is the regional interest in tidal modelling per se as well as in the low frequency motion, which requires accurate knowledge of tidal processes. An important application is the development of tidal corrections for the processing of satellite altimetry data. How do tides respond in the Indonesian region? Do the methods developed for parameterising sub grid-scale reef topography in the GBR work in the Indonesian archipelago?

Altimetry tracks are interrupted spatially in this complex region, while tides change rapidly over small space scales. The global tidal models developed for analysing the TOPEX satellite altimetry data including FES 95 (Le Provost et al., Grenoble) and CSR 3.0 (Eanes, University of Texas) show lots of amphidromes and other structural complexities in this area. Differences between these two models in parts of the region exceed 2m amplitude. There are large errors even in relatively deep areas. The signal obtained by differencing the principal lunar tide (M2) results for the two models has an amplitude of 2 to 4 m in places within the Indonesian archipelago.

There is plenty of in situ data available from this region for intercomparison with models, but much of it is of questionable reliability. Obtaining correct bathymetry is also difficult, yet important for its effects on phase speeds and bottom friction. Phase speeds computed for Digitised map versus 5’ of arc Etopo5 bathymetry data agree quite well off the NW shelf, but as frictional differences are inversely proportional to depth, differences in shallow water are more critical. The biggest difference, however, comes from errors in the phase speed.

What improvement results from using the sub-grid scale parameterisation? This was illustrated with reference to a 2D ¼ deg resolution model using Etopo 5 bathymetry.

Summary

  • There is a need for improved tidal modelling of this region.
  • Bathymetry and in situ tidal elevation data are inadequate (Quantity versus Quality).
  • The geometric complexity of the region lends itself to parameterisation.

 

 

 

Top of page

contents
previous
next

-AIMS home

 

web@aims.gov.au

Last updated - 24 May, 2000

Copyright ©1996-1999 Australian Institute of Marine Science

URL http://www.aims.gov.au

[ About AIMS ] [ AIMS research ] [ AIMS facilities ] [ AIMS news ] [ AIMS search ]
[
AIMS publications ] [ Doing business with AIMS ] [ What's new ]
[
Site index ] [ Navigating this site ]

 


AIMS Research