Home
About AIMS
Research
Facilities
News
Search
Site
map
Site
index
Topics
index
Further
information
about
Coral bleaching
Seagrasses
|
Seaweeds
save the reef?!
Sargassum
Canopy Decreases Coral Bleaching on Inshore Reefs
Jamal Jompa1,2 and Laurence
McCook1
1Australian
Institute of Marine Science & CRC: Reef
Research
2Department of
Marine Biology, JCU
Widespread
bleaching of reef corals has recently been
reported from inshore reefs in the Townsville
region, apparently as a result of exceptional
weather conditions and flooding during January.
The likely causes of this bleaching include low
salinity, high temperature, and high UV light
intensity. We here report a surprising increase
in coral bleaching in plots from which the
normally abundant canopy of seaweeds had been
experimentally removed.
Many inshore reefs
of the GBR have abundant beds of large brown
seaweeds or macroalgae on the reef flat, often
dominated by species of Sargassum. The
abundance of these seaweeds have been suggested
to be a result or even a cause of reef
degradation, as increased terrestrial runoff
causes makes reef waters less suitable for corals
and more suitable for algae. However, there is
remarkably little direct evidence for effects of
macroalgae on corals. It may be that these
conditions allow algae to outcompete corals,
causing reef decline. In order to test for such
effects, we have established and maintained large
(5 x 5 m) plots from which we have been removing
the Sargassum for nearly 18 months, at
several sites on two inshore reefs, one at Goold
Island, north of Hinchinbrook Island, and the
other at Cannon Bay, on Great Palm Island. We
also have control plots, in which the Sargassum
has been left in place, forming a thick canopy
often 1-2 metres high, with 100% cover. Despite
this Sargassum canopy, the plots had
quite high cover of live corals (up to 50%).
In the middle of
February 1998, more than a month after the major
flooding events, we noticed considerable
bleaching of corals at both reefs. We
consequently surveyed the amount and types of
bleached corals in both Sargassum canopy
(control) and removal plots. There are two sites
at each reef and each site includes two plots of
each treatment (Sargassum removal and
control). Four 5 m line intercept transects
within the plots were used to measure coral cover
(in cm). Corals were recorded at genus level and
the condition of each coral scored in one of 4
categories: bleached (0), pale/mostly bleached
(1), slightly bleached (2), and healthy/no
bleaching (3). In this report, we consider
categories 0 and 1 as 'bleached corals' and
categories 2 and 3 as 'healthy corals'.
The percentage of
corals which were bleached in removal and control
treatments is presented in Fig. 1. At both reefs,
the average percentage of corals bleached was
significantly higher in plots which had had the Sargassum
canopy removed than in plots with an intact
canopy of the macroalgae (P<0.05). Overall,
19.6% of corals were bleached under
"normal" conditions for these reefs,
but 36.4% were bleached when the Sargassum
canopy had been experimentally removed.
Species of Acropora
seem to be the corals most affected, especially
at Great Palm Island, where almost 100 % of Acropora
were bleached. At Goold Reef, corals of the
genera Acropora, Porites, Montipora
and Favites were most affected by the
bleaching event. However, bleaching was common
among all taxa noted. Further, it seems that the
protection afforded by the Sargassum
canopy was not limited to particular coral
species.
It seems likely
that the seaweed canopy reduces damage to the
corals by decreasing exposure to high
temperatures, high UV light intensities, or
perhaps by reducing mixing of low-salinity
waters. Evidence is available for similar effects
of algal canopies from temperate areas: such
canopies can dramatically reduce thermal stress
and water movement. The significance of this
result is considerable, since it raises the
possibility that algal canopies could actually
provide protection to corals, instead of, or as
well as, competing with them. Although the
results by no means disprove the possibilities
that corals are inhibited by macroalgae, they
certainly provide further evidence that abundant
macroalgae should not be assumed to be
detrimental to inshore reefs without much more
information.
 |
Figure
1: Percentage of
all corals considered bleached in plots
with Sargassum canopy removed
(Removal) or left intact (Control), shown
separately for reefs at Goold Island,
north of Hinchinbrook Island, and Cannon
Bay, on Great Palm Island.
|
For
further information contact:
Dr. Laurence
McCook
Australian Institute of Marine Science
e-Mail: l.mccook@aims.gov.au
Telephone: +61-7-47534362
AIMS home page
web@aims.gov.au
Last updated - 15 August 98
Copyright ©1996-1998 Australian Institute of
Marine Science
URL
http://www.aims.gov.au
|