|
The whole monitoring system will form part of a proposed Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS), itself part of the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) being put together by a number of international organisations.
The first two pilot activities are important components of the ocean-observing system, while carbon accumulation is an important issue for scientists seeking to understand the sources and sinks of carbon on a global scale. Studying the plankton, mangrove and coral reef communities will provide essential information about the biological systems of coastal wetlands, marine benthic ecosystems and pelagic communities. Of these three, coral reef and mangrove monitoring have been given priority.
Experts at the Paris meeting said that data collected over 2-3 years could provide a baseline status report on the health of reef systems in selected sites. This would be valuable to coastal zone managers in places where reefs form a major source of renewable resources. Priority during the pilot phase will go to developing standardised formats for exchanging data.
Two further meetings were held in December 1991. The first was a workshop in Amersfoort, Netherlands, organised by IUCN, WWF International, the Royal Netherlands Institute of Public and Environmental Health and the US Environmental Protection Agency which reviewed the potential impacts of climate change on coral reefs. The workshop indicated five key research needs and also called urgently for a reduction of sediment and nutrient loads on coral reefs.
The second meeting co-sponsored by UNEP, IOC, WMO and IUCN brought together 18 experts on coral reef and mangrove biology. This meeting took into
consideration the reviews prepared in Amersfoort in amplifying and developing the proposed monitoring scheme recommended by the Paris meeting.
Several other organisations joined the original sponsors in holding a workshop in Guam on 22-26 June 1992 in conjunction with the 7th International Coral Reef Symposium. This meeting enabled the organisers to test the reactions of the scientific community to the proposed network and pilot phase monitoring programme. They backed the programme and suggested all institutions and organisations should be encouraged to participate in implementing the pilot phase.
The scientists noted that 5-10 laboratories are currently capable of very sophisticated monitoring and analysis, but they also found an obvious need for a more extensive network so that more institutes and researchers could be involved, particularly to identify global trends. This means simple data collection methods should also have a place in the programme. The scientists suggested these less technology-dependent techniques could be linked with more sophisticated systems through simultaneous activities.
|