The
Australian Institute
of Marine Science
(AIMS) and the
Australian Geological
Survey Organisation
(AGSO) have combined
their expertise to conduct
the first multi-disciplinary
study of Produced
Formation Water
discharged into
Australia's shallow
coastal seas. Dr Kathryn
Burns reports on the
project.
|
Much of Australia's current oil
production is in the shallow coastal
waters of the North West Shelf and Bass
Strait. During offshore production, water
trapped in oil and the bearing rocks
(Produced Formation Water - PFW) is
brought to the surface and is treated and
discharged from the offshore platform.
While Australian oil and gas companies
generally exceed legislative requirements
(best available practices), the
dispersion and fate of PFW discharge into
our shallow coastal seas warrants
investigation. With support from the
Australian Petroleum Production and
Exploration Association and the Energy
Research and Development Corporation
(APPEA/ERDC), the Australian Institute of
Marine Science (AIMS) and the Australian
Geological Survey Organisation (AGSO)
combined their expertise to conduct the
first multi-disciplinary study of this
issue in Australia. Using the AIMS research vessel,
Lady Basten, the project team conducted
detailed measurements around the Harriet
Alpha platform on the NW Shelf in
September 1995. The Harriet A platform is
a major source of PFW on the NW Shelf. A
pilot study conducted the previous year
provided a good basis for planning field
sampling and analyses. Dr Miles Fumas and
Alan Mitchell were the biological
oceanographers. Two current meter arrays
were set to record tidal speed and
directions over the time period which
covered both spring and neap tide
conditions. The oceanographic properties
and processes measured included water
temperature, salinity, subsurface light
penetration, ambient nutrient
concentrations, the quantity and quality
of the water column particulate matter,
phyto- and zoo-plankton biomass, primary
production, bacterial production,
nutrient utilisation rates, and fluxes of
particulate matter to the sediments.
Experiments were also carried out to
measure the responses of natural
phytoplankton and pelagic bacterial
populations to important PFW
constituents.
AIMS has conducted
hydrographic measurements on the NW Shelf
for many years and the present study can
be compared with this larger database.
The waters around the area of Varanus
Island and the Harriet platform were
generally well mixed by tidal currents
and had characteristically low dissolved
nutrients and phytoplankton biomass
concentrations. Despite this, primary
production rates were relatively high.
Doubling times for the phytoplankton were
calculated to be greater than once per
day, with a substantial portion of the
production (19 to 79%) diverted to
bacterial pools. Direct measurements of
the uptake rates of limiting nutrients in
the water column gave turnover times of
0.5 to 1 hour. This fast rate of growth
was found both near the platform and at
control sites in shallow waters far away
from the platform.
Based on the records of
PFW discharged and the concentrations of
nutrients and organic carbon in the
effluent, the team concluded that daily
discharges of organic carbon and
phosphates were small compared with the
natural supply rates of these materials.
In the case of nitrogen, the daily output
was significant, but it appeared to be
rapidl dispersed and utilised by the
plankton. The ship-board experiments
showed some inhibition of bacterial and
phytoplankton production by PFW and some
of its constituents.
This data will be used
to estimate an area of potential impact
within the vicinity of the discharge
after the modelling team and chemists
define the areas of the plumes, and the
dilution and dispersion processes. Drs
David Heggie, David Holdway and Colin
Tindall miniaturised the real time gas
sampling gear which AGSO normally uses
for oil and gas exploration work from the
much larger ship, Rig Seismic. From the
Lady Basten they provided fine timeline
tracers of the PFW plume using volatile
hydrocarbon distributions (benzene and
toluene, plus methane to hexane totals).
The ships captain,
Brian McCarthy, became adept at spotting
the plume and steamed the ship slowly
across it during the various tidal
cycles. Volatile hydrocarbons were
measured every two minutes, and included
both surface and depth samples. Each data
point was identified by time and
position. The volatile hydrocarbon
analyses detected very low concentration
of some hydrocarbons in the plume (close
to the limits of detection of two parts
per trillion) up to 10 nautical miles
(nm) in the directions of tidal forcing.
From this data set, it was possible to
define both the horizontal and the
vertical diffusion parameters and load
these into a model to characterise plume
mixing for the region.
|
| |
These field data provided an
unique opportunity to calibrate, verify
and modify the input parameters of the
advanced dispersion model @MUDMAP for
Australian environmental and operational
conditions. Dr Brian King and Felicity
McAllister of AIMS, used the @MUDMAP
model to assist the team in planning the
fieldwork. The results of the fieldwork
were then used to test the model. A
comparison of predicted plume positions
was made by using @MUDMAP with (a) the
actual point-source current meter data
near the platform and (b) with predicted
current data from the fine resolution and
verified 3 dimensional hydrodynamic
@OILTRACK model over the whole study
area. This
comparison revealed that both techniques
provided good predictions of the near
platform PFW distributions. However point
source data was not useful for farfield
prediction when there was spatial
variability on the current field, as is
usual in shallow coastal waters. The
model predicted the changes in plume
dispersion and concentrations due to
tidal oscillations and showed that
previously dispersed PFW water may return
in later tidal cycles for a "second
dosing" only in very calm
conditions. Validating the model
predictions with high resolution field
data creates an effective management tool
for defining potential impacts by
simulating best and worst case scenarios
for environmental assessment. Further, it
can be used to estimate the impact of.
changes in practices, such as altering
pipe diameters or improving oil removal
prior to PFW discharge.
The hydrocarbon
chemists were Dr. Kathryn Burns and Sue
Codi. They measured the dispersion of the
PFW into dissolved and undissolved
fractions using moored water samplers,
surface screen samplers and moored
sediment traps. Much of the undissolved
fractions appeared to have bound to small
particles. They studied bio-accumulation
by using transplanted oysters. They
measured dispersion into sediment with
benthic grab samples. These samples were
frozen and returned to AIMS for detailed
analysis.
|
| |
Oysters suspended near the
platform showed uptake and release of
hydrocarbons and other organic compounds
of unknown origin into their tissues over
time. Surface microlayers showed
enrichment of hydrocarbons up to a
distance of about 1 nm. High volume water
samples illustrated that a process of
desorption from particles for
non-volatile hydrocarbons potentially
occurs within the range of 1 nm. Most of
the particulate hydrocarbons dropped out
of suspension within about 0.5 nm, with
extension up to approximately 1 nm in the
direction of tidal flows. Based on these
results, the team estimated that the
impact of the PFW in the water column
would be confined to a distance of
approximately 0.5 nm in the direction of
tidal flow. There
was a decrease in sediment oil
concentrations within the 0.5 nm radius
from 2.8 mg/g
dry wt (average of 16 samples) in 1994 to
1.0 mg/g dry wt (average of 20
samples) in 1995. This decrease between
the years probably reflects the decrease
in particulate associated residues
discharged within the dispersed plume by
the platform, due to the addition of a
centrifugal separator (hydrocyclone).
Concentrations of oil from the PFW
discharge associated with the production
of the relatively light crude oil result
in a definable pattern of trace
contamination of the surrounding
sediments. However, residence time of the
oil in the sediments was estimated to be
less than 1 year. Concentrations of oil
in sediments at both sampling times
around Harriet A were within the range of
recently published control (unoiled
reference) sites in the Caribbean.
Our sensitive
analytical methods and effective sampling
strategy defined the distribution of oil
in sediments around the platform. While
it is considered unlikely that benthic
ecosystems would be adversely impacted,
the team concluded that further
assessment at this site should emphasize:
processes of bio-accumulation, potential
water column toxicity, and the further
study of benthic communities. Future
chemical studies could focus on
photooxidation and evaporation as the
likely major mechanisms for removing
hydrocarbons from the surface seawaters.
The collaborative
application of oceanographic, geochemical
and modelling techniques is providing
effective feedback to industry on the
impact of their operational strategies in
Australia's pristine offshore coastal
regions. A future report will be about
verifying dispersion models for platform
discharges in Bass Strait.
|