AIMS Research Logo

-
AIMS home
-
About AIMS
-
Research
-
Facilities
-
News 
-
Search
-
Site map
-
Site index
-
Topics index



Media release

Study finds holes in carbon sink theory 


 

The Newsroom  

 

 

 
Wet tropics carbon sink?

Are the wet tropics really a sink for carbon?

Feature
by Kerie Hull
June 16, 2003

After years of believing the continental shelves in wet tropical areas around the world help soak up fossil fuel carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, an international consortium of scientists have found holes in the theory.

It was long believed that continental shelves act as sites of atmospheric carbon dioxide removal by burying organic matter in sediments.

The latest evidence shows the continental shelf of the Gulf of Papua is a source of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, which is contrary to most current climate change models depicting the coastal ocean as an important site of removal of CO2 from the atmosphere.

It is an important finding because of the implications to the global carbon budget. Dr Gregg Brunskill of the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) said, "Wet tropical parts of the world contribute over 50% of global continental runoff and sediment, but these regions do not appear to be sites of large carbon sequestration (burial, removal from the atmosphere). It could force those predicting the fate of fossil fuel carbon dioxide and climate change to rework their models."

Sediment traps being deployed.

 Sediment traps being deployed.

Dr Gregg Brunskill is a biogeochemist, and is one of the leaders of the international research project called TROPICS – Tropical River-Ocean Processes in Coastal Settings – which has been trying to identify the role continental shelves play in the carbon cycle (amongst other things). The research team uses data collected over a decade by an informal, international consortium of marine scientists.

More than 20 international research institutions are involved in the project which has reached its final phase. Project coordinators are in full swing collating and writing up their findings for publication.

One task of Brunskill’s team was to demonstrate that the most important burial site for organic matter in the ocean is on continental shelves. It would mean that continental shelves are a major sink, a place where carbon is removed from the atmosphere and buried in the sediment. The team set out to measure how much carbon is buried as organic matter and how fast this process occurs in the river deltas, the steamy mangrove swamps, and out across the continental shelf to 1000 metre water depths.

Background

The emission of carbon dioxide from the combustion of fossil fuels and land use change is the leading cause of the build up of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, which many people believe is the main culprit behind an increase in the earth’s temperatures.

For a long time scientists have known that forests, crops, soils, and other organic matter soak up some of that carbon, thereby slowing down the rate of global warming. The calculations of how much carbon is absorbed by the land and ocean is the basis of much debate.

Scientists have been given the hard task of trying to measure the exchange rates of organic matter and CO2 between the ocean, atmosphere, and land, and to create an inventory of natural & technological sources of CO2, and natural and technological CO2 removal rates (sinks) in terrestrial soils and oceanic sediments. Oceanographers have found that different zones of the ocean absorb CO2 from the atmosphere (sink), or release CO2 to the atmosphere (source) at different times of the year. Because wet tropical regions of the world deliver large amounts of organic matter-rich soils to the coastal ocean, it was thought that burial of this terrestrial and associated marine organic matter on continental shelves would be an important site of removal of fossil fuel CO2 in the global inventory.

Oceanographers who are helping to create this global inventory of organic carbon and CO2 in the ocean have found that carbon burial rates on continental shelves of the temperate and polar regions are very slow. It was expected that carbon burial rates in wet tropical parts of the world would be very fast. Scientists are now trying to determine if this is true.

Map of Papua New Guinea

Map of Papua New Guinea 
( Click here for a larger view

The Gulf of Papua was one of many sites studied. The Great Barrier Reef, the north West shelf of Australia, South China Sea and the coastal zone of the Amazon River are just some of the areas contributing to the global inventory, and the Gulf of Papua is considered to be most representative of the wet tropics. "Everything happens very quickly and on a large scale in this region," Brunskill said.

"Due to high rainfall, high mountain ranges, and tectonically active land mass, the island of New Guinea contributes more water, solutes and sediment to the coastal ocean than the Amazon River."

With big expectations of the Gulf of Papua as a major carbon sink, the measurements coming from the region had researchers, including Brunskill, scratching their heads.

"Global models of oceans assign large carbon burial rates to continental shelves. While it’s true, we found the burial rates to be large, the decomposition rate of terrestrial and marine organic matter was even greater, "said Dr Gregg Brunskill.

"The measurements suggest that most of the organic carbon being delivered to the continental shelf of the Gulf of Papua by rivers and by estuarine productivity is being oxidised and returned to the atmosphere," he said.

Preparing to take a core from the mud bank.

 Preparing to take a core from the mud bank.

This is the thrust of Dr Brunskill’s own work. He and his colleagues Irena Zagorskis and John Pfitzner at AIMS are charged with the task of studying the burial rate of organic carbon in the rapidly accumulating sediment of the Gulf of Papua. Dr Brunskill measures the burial rate using sediment cores. He measures the organic matter content of the mud, and measures how fast the mud and organic matter is being buried using natural radioactive elements.

"Our research is carried out on big ships where a tonne of lead is lowered on top of a big pipe into the mud. I get a sample of mud about two, three, or four metres long and slice it up into layers like pages in a history book for the last 100 to 1000 years.

"I can determine how organic matter concentration changes with depth of the mud, and figure out the accumulation rate of the organic carbon and sediment. I can then tell you the removal rate of carbon for 20 or 30 locations in the Gulf of Papua, and then estimate the total organic carbon burial per year on the whole shelf. We then compare this burial rate to marine plant annual growth rates and the annual input of organic matter from rivers. 

Taking cores from the rear work area on the RV Cape Ferguson.

Taking cores from the rear work area 
on the RV Cape Ferguson.

We also try to measure how fast this river and marine plant organic matter is being decomposed."

The research team has found that the decomposition rate of organic matter is equal to or greater than the measured supply rate of organic matter from rivers and plant growth. To balance the budget, the team has to import more organic matter from the Coral Sea to feed this voracious incinerator of organic matter. This finding suggests that more CO2 is being released from the sea to the atmosphere, than is being buried in the mud. The region is thus a net source of CO2 to the atmosphere, even if large amounts of organic matter is being buried in the mud today.

"Wet tropical continental shelves are probably good incinerators of organic matter because they are warm, have a high and steady nutrient supply, and have many kinds of microorganisms that decompose organic matter in the water and deep in the mud," said Brunskill.

The credentials, expertise and experience on this scientific team add weight to the findings that are sure to send carbon accountants scuffling to consult and even re-jig their models. 

The RV Cape Ferguson in the Gulf of Papua.

The RV Cape Ferguson 
in the Gulf of Papua.

Dr. Brunskill is confident his research that shows that tropical continental shelves aren’t siphoning off as much fossil fuel CO2 as expected, and could be a source of CO2, will stand the test of time.

Project TROPICS is a joint Australian, Indonesian, Papua New Guinean and American Marine science team focused on wet tropical inputs of riverine matter to the world ocean.

While the project is winding up, the research is not. It has evolved into a new research programme called Margins.

MARGINS is a USA funded research consortium which is taking the TROPICS results on to the next stage of investigation. Scientists are studying the cycles and transport of water, sediment, and chemical elements from the PNG mountain tops, down the rivers to the floodplain, into the deltas and mangrove swamps, the continental shelf and slope, and into the Coral Sea. Larger ships are being used, which allow detailed maps of the seafloor, seismic soundings of the thickness of New Guinea terrestrial sediments on the shelf, and longer histories of burial rates of the chemical elements. Scientists and students from USA, PNG, and Australia are participating in research cruises in the Gulf of Papua in 2003-2005.

Locals visiting the coring area. Sediment plume from the Fly river in the Gulf of Papua.
Locals visiting the coring area.
Sediment plume from the Fly river
 in the Gulf of Papua.

 

For more information contact 
Dr Gregg Brunskill, (AIMS) researcher
Telephone: 07 4753 4218 or 0417231429 
Email: g.brunskill@aims.gov.au 

 

 

  -AIMS home page
 
Top of page



web@aims.gov.au
Last updated - December 18, 2008

Copyright ©1996-2006 Australian Institute of Marine Science

URL http://www.aims.gov.au


 

[ About AIMS ] [ AIMS research ] [ AIMS facilities ] [ AIMS news ] [ AIMS search ]
[ AIMS publications ] [ Doing business with AIMS ] [ What's new ]
[ Site index ] [ Navigating this site ] [ Privacy policy ]

AIMS News Logo


 Hit Counter 2430 20030616 20060410