Biodiversity
and
ecology
Climate change
Ecosystem health
Marine microbes
Monitoring
Sustainable use
Biodiscovery
Tropical aquaculture
Impacts
Ornamentals
Prawns
Rock lobster
Sponges
Water quality
___________________
Sea cage
aquaculture
Contents
Project 1
Background
Sampling sites
Water
quality
Key
results
Planning tools
CADS_TOOL
Tidal predictors
Circulation models
Land capability maps
Site suitability map
Water Quality Data
Annual
reports
Project 2
Final report
Executive summary
Final report
Videos
Physical circulation
Wild
fish around
sea cages
___________________
Research activities
Research capabilities
Strategic directions
Research staff
Research links
AIMS data centre
|
You are at -
Home |
Research |
Sustainable
use
________________________________________________________________________
| Sea Cage Aquaculture
The key results of this project are:
- The environmental footprint of all the studied seacage farms was
highly localised. Benthic data from under the farms and with distance
indicated moderate enrichment under the cages with no clearly
discernible impact of fish cage aquaculture on the adjacent environment.
At Ayong Farm, rates of benthic DIC (dissolved inorganic carbon),
dissolved nutrient, sulfide, and methane release, and rates of sulfate
reduction, were higher under the fish cages than at 100m distance
down-current. At the Awarange Bay farm, most differences were
inconsistent with season. Although the rates of pelagic and benthic
respiration were greater at the Ayong Farm, proportionally more organic
carbon was exported (29%) to the adjacent environment or buried (4%)
than at the Sulawesi operation (16% and 2%, respectively). More carbon
was mineralised in the water column than in the sediment at the Ayong
Farm, whereas the opposite is true for the Sulawesi farm, but helping to
minimise export to adjacent habitats.
- Understanding the circulation of water in the vicinity of farms is
critical to understanding the physical dispersal of aquaculture wastes.
In microtidal environments such as those we studied in Indonesia, wastes
do not disperse far from the cage area. In these environments chemical
and biological transformation processes are more important in removing
waste products. The bulk of the farm-derived organic matter is primarily
broken down by microbes in the water-column and secondarily on the
seabed. In macrotidal environments such as Bathurst Island, strong tidal
currents remove and distribute waste products over a large area.
- A decision support tool for calculating the environmental carrying
capacity for seacage aquaculture has been developed, and is publicly
available.
CADS_TOOL
(Cage Aquaculture Decision Support Tool)
- In collaboration with FIS 2002/076, a map series has been produced
for South Sulawesi that can be used as a model for other provinces.
Seacage
Aquaculture Site Suitability Map, Barru Regency, South Sulawesi.
- In collaboration with FIS 2002/076, a Local Advisory Committee for
aquaculture planning has been established in South Sulawesi, and a
National Steering Committee established in Jakarta to further extend the
project recommendations nationally.
March 10, 2009 |
|
|