GBR protected from crown-of-thorns attacks by
no-take zones
July 22, 2008
Reefs where fishing is not allowed are much less prone to infestation by the
devastating crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS), according to a new analysis of
AIMS’ long-term surveys of the Great Barrier Reef.
AIMS scientist Dr Hugh Sweatman predicts that any future waves of COTS
outbreaks will not be as destructive as the three waves that have affected the
GBR since 1960, because the area of no-take zones on the GBR was increased from
4.5 per cent of the Reef to 33 per cent in 2004.
|
No-take zones, regulated by the
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, are designated areas known as "green
zones" where no fishing is allowed. Dr Sweatman’s findings are published in
the latest issue of the journal Current Biology*.
The starfish is a major management problem on coral reefs from Central
America to Kenya and the Red Sea. They eat coral voraciously and wipe out nearly
all coral on the reefs they infest. In the past 40 years they have caused much
more damage to GBR reefs than have storms or coral bleaching.
Waves of outbreaks last about 15 years, beginning in the northern reaches of
the GBR and then moving southward through the central areas.
The recent Status Report on the GBR, released by AIMS’ Long-Term Monitoring
Program in June, reported that COTS outbreaks were at a 20 year low. This new
analysis points to the starfish causing less damage in the future. |


Crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster
planci).
Images: AIMS LTMP
|
By comparing the frequency of starfish outbreaks on no-take reefs and on
reefs where fishing was allowed, Dr Sweatman showed that there was a clear
pattern. "The relative frequency of outbreaks on reefs that were open to fishing
was 3.75 times higher than that on no-take reefs in the mid-shelf region of the
GBR, where most of the outbreaks occur," Dr Sweatman said. However, the
ecological link between exploited fishes and COTS remains uncertain.
The reef fishes that fishermen target are unlikely to prey upon COTS, but
there may be several links in the ecological chain: more large predatory fishes
in no-take areas may reduce the numbers of smaller fishes, in turn reducing
predation on invertebrate species such as worms and crustaceans that prey on
very small juvenile starfish. This process remains to be fully researched.
Dr Sweatman said this finding boosted the scientific case for protection of
reef ecosystems.
"This study provides an additional argument for establishment of effective
marine protected areas wherever the starfish occurs, as refuges from
exploitation and other threats and as sources for re-colonisation of damaged
reefs to increase ecological resilience," he said.
To access Dr Sweatman’s Current Biology article, please go to:
http://www.current-biology.com/
Read Dr Sweatman’s Current Biology article:
sweatman-2008-cots-mpas-biology-paper.pdf
(142Kb PDF file)
Implementing the Marine and Tropical Sciences Research
Facility in North Queensland